Trump To Federal Judge: James Robart's Order is an"outrageous order" Files an emergency Halt Of The Judge's Order. Would It Be Granted or Nah!

 

At the earliest possible time, the Department of Justice intends to file an emergency stay of this order and defend the executive order of the President, which we believe is lawful and appropriate," the late Friday statement read. 

The White House initially labeled the judge's action an "outrageous order" but within 10 minutes had sent a second, nearly identical statement that stripped out that adjective.

 “The president’s order is intended to protect the homeland and he has the constitutional authority and responsibility to protect the American people.

Judge James Robart, who was appointed by former President George Bush in 2003, ruled earlier Friday that the executive order would be stopped nationwide, effective immediately.

The ruling, made at the request of Washington and Minnesota, is the broadest to date against Trump's executive order.

Trump's action bans people from Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Sudan and Somalia from entering the U.S. for 90 days, and temporarily halts the United States' refugee resettlement program for 120 days, while indefinitely suspending resettlement for refugees from Syria.

The question now is; Would the same court of Justice that gave a restraining order, revert in another court of competent jurisdiction when the ''emergency stay of order is brought to it?

Share your views.